MSEL = 15
ISUB =
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
|
In this section we mainly consider the production of
pairs
by fermion-antifermion annihilation, but also include two processes
which involve
beams. Scatterings between gauge-boson
pairs, i.e. processes like
, depend so
crucially on the assumed Higgs scenario that they are considered
separately in section
.
The cross sections used for the above processes are those derived
in the narrow-width limit, but have been extended to include
Breit-Wigner shapes with mass-dependent widths for the final-state
particles. In process 25, the contribution from
exchange
to the cross section is now evaluated with the fixed nominal
mass and width in the propagator. If instead the actual mass and the
running width were to be used, it would give a diverging cross section at
large energies, by imperfect gauge cancellation.
However, one should realize that other graphs, not included here, can
contribute in regions away from the
mass. This problem is
especially important if several flavours coincide in the four-fermion
final state. Consider, as an example,
.
Not only would such a final state receive contributions from
intermediate
and
states, but also
from processes
, followed
either by
,
or by
.
In addition, all possible interferences should be considered.
Since this is not done, the processes have to be used with some
sound judgement. Very often, one may wish to constrain a
lepton pair mass to be close to
, in which case a number
of the possible `other' processes are negligible.
For the
pair production graph, one experimental objective is to do
precision measurements of the cross section near threshold. Then also
other effects enter. One such is Coulomb corrections, induced by
photon exchange between the two
's and their decay products.
The gauge invariance issues induced by the finite
lifetime are not
yet fully resolved, and therefore somewhat different approximate formulae
may be derived [Kho96]. The options in MSTP(40) provide a
reasonable range of uncertainty.
Of the above processes, the first contains the full
structure, obtained by a
straightforward generalization of the formulae in ref. [Gun86]
(done by one of the PYTHIA authors). Of course, the possibility of
there being significant contributions from graphs that are not
included is increased, in particular
if one
is very light and therefore could be a
bremsstrahlung-type photon. It is possible to use MSTP(43) to
recover the pure
case, i.e.
exclusively. In processes 23 and 70, only the pure
contribution
is included.
Full angular correlations are included for the first three processes,
i.e. the full
matrix elements are included in the
resonance decays, including the appropriate
interference
in process 22. In the latter two processes, 69 and 70, no spin
information is currently preserved, i.e. the
bosons are
allowed to decay isotropically.
We remind you that the mass ranges of the two resonances may be set with the CKIN(41) - CKIN(44) parameters; this is particularly convenient, for instance, to pick one resonance almost on the mass shell and the other not.