GMINOS for the Mock Data Challenge
This page documents many of the changes made to GMINOS subsequent to
the state at which it was at on 2003-01-30 as described in
http://home.fnal.gov/~rhatcher/review_and_status_030131.html.
In summary the major changes include:
- Change to using RANLUX for the random number generator.
- Connection to Hugh Gallagher's Neugen3 event generator; an updated
and revised version of NEUGEN(2).
- New flux method (MFLX 5) that reads and reweights
gNuMI column-wise output files directly.
- New module based ('M') planes
OLD files are available.
RANLUX
Users were reporting exact reproduction of events in the case of
the 1/e flux (which give approximately flat event distribution).
Somehow sufficient random values were being used that the cycle
ended up supplying exactly the same value for first use in an event
for sufficiently long runs. The mechanics of this are not quite
understood, but it was thought unlikely that this should occur
for runs using external fluxes. But to solve this problem in
the general case the GRNDM routine was linked to calling
RANLUX which has a much longer periodicity. Thanks go
to Mark Messier who pointed me at where he did this for gNuMI.
Neugen3
Hugh significantly improved event generator is linked in (if/when
the env variable NEUGEN3PATH is defined). One then choses between
"classic" NEUGEN (sometimes referred to as NEUGEN2)
and Neugen3 by setting the MKIN card to +2 or -2.
gNuMI Flux
Flux method 5 (MFLX 5) has been implemented to directly
read gnumi column-wise ntuples.
To do or check:
- re-re-check event rates. Early test showed right number of
events in FarDet for a given # of POTs, but that near
det rate seemed ~14% low. Some of this is attributable
to falloff of flux as NearDet doesn't see point source
(which changes the spectrum over the volume). But test
using MC integration could account for only some of this.
Perhaps with more statistics.
M-planes: module based planes
Significant progress has been made in updating the geometry.
Module based geometry is in place (and now enabled for both
NearDet and FarDet) that has
"official" strip lengths and WLS pigtails.
The strips are collected into
modules of the right number of strips (as opposed to the F
planes where all modules had the same number of strips).
Each module is wrapped in an aluminum skin of 0.5mm. The gap
between strips in a module is set to 0.2mm; additionally there is
a gap of 2mm between modules. The clear fiber lengths for
each module type (plane coverage, view, side and module in the plane)
is taken to be the "as-built" average;
no plane-to-plane variation is put in.
| Det |
Coverage |
U plane |
V plane |
| Near |
Partial |
 |
 |
| Full |
 |
 |
| Far |
Complete |
 |
 |
Click on a image to get full scaled version
common features and deficiencies
For the new geometries the UGLIDBI tables in the offline
database have been installed. Use the date range
2003-12-17 to 2003-12-21 on
http://www-numi.fnal.gov/minwork/computing/find_db_update.html
to show what SEQNO's have been added to each of the tables.
Note that the entries are made for SimFlag::kMC
as well as SimFlag::kReroot for all the positioning tables.
The entries are for all SimFlag values for the tables
that record the overall Hall sizes and structural quantities
(strips/module, strip and wls lengths, etc).
The database constants appear to have incorrect values for the
WLS fiber used in the bypass region -- it seems to be equal to
the length of the missing region rather than accounting for
the actual path of the swoop around the coil.
At the time of this writing (2003-12-22) the region near the coil
for both NearDet full and FarDet complete planes
has active strips right up to the coil. This, of course, is not
true in reality. Modelling a good approximation of the shape
of the bypass inserts is difficult. Having the mass of the strips
in place is probably not too incorrect, if only they wouldn't generate
hits. This may lend itself to a post-hoc approximation where hits
in this region are simply removed (and those straddling the boundary
are appropriately truncated). But code for this has not been
fully developed, though recent changes to UgliStripHandle
should now make the necessary info available via PartialLength().
Detector specific improvements/deficiencies:
NearDet
As seen in the pictures above there is now a Better approximation for
the steel; it is only missing filet from the sides to the inside of the
rail and the outer earlobe that hangs down outside the rails and the
minor loss of the slots for the axial bolts.
The estimate for the mass of the BXPL steel planes is 3.45125 tons/plane
which translates to 0.976kt for 282 planes. My hand estimation of
the contribution to the mass from scintillator is less than roughly
0.0292kt (or 3%).
The beam center location relative to the plane has been reverified
( x0 = 148.84cm, y0=40.9cm in the first steel plane ).
To do or check:
- the exact placement of modules on the plane is still unverified --
it looks approximately correct but isn't necessarily based on reality.
- the vertical placement of the detector relative
to the hall floor is correct, but the east-west and north-south
placement is still unadjusted.
- The shape of the hall is still a box, with no accounting for the
overhang on the east side.
- verify the collar dimensions
FarDet geometry
SM1 and SM2 have as-built
numbers of planes. Average spacing of SM1 and SM2 planes adjusted to
match individual measured average (5.94 cm nominal vs. 5.949/5.943).
The gap between the supermodules has also been adjusted to match
measurements. The size of the hall has been adjusted to match
the as-built size -- the newly dimensioned size means
that the veto shield upper wall should no longer appear to be
embedded in the rock. Coil material is a foam approximating the
density and composition of the the coductor region (copper,
insulator, water, etc). The steel collar is in place (but
extends too far out the ends).
OLD files
No. No. No. Do NOT use these any more!
They have been supplanted by the proper Mock Data Challenge files.
See the following pages concerning the
Mock Data Challenge:
general info,
Ely talk[PDF]
The files below lack important corrections including
changes to the flux (ie. the high-energy tail is too large)
and for the overlay file the instantaneous POTs is too high
(4.0 vs. 2.4). There are probably other differences as well.
Besides, the true MDC set has superior statistics.
Data files using all the above features are now available
on /afs/fnal.gov/files/data/minos/:
| dir | file | size |
| d17/detsim03/mock_data |
gm_geom_far.preMDC.reroot.root |
843MB |
| d17/detsim03/mock_data |
gm_geom_far_nue.preMDC.reroot.root |
227MB |
| d17/detsim03/mock_data |
gm_geom_near.preMDC.reroot.root |
341MB |
| d17/detsim03/mock_data |
gm_geom_overlay.preMDC.reroot.root |
245MB |
I don't really know why the near file is larger than the
overlay file (which should contain all the near
events as well as the rock events. This could be because
of an error in the digitization process on the near file.
Since all of FLSDigit is superceded with the new
PhotonTransport + DetSim code that wouldn't matter.
A quick look did show that the records did contain roughly the
right number of pileup events. The reduction could also come in
part from the elimination of numerous redundant copies (one
per record) of the FLSParam table.
The files were generated on
minos-rhatcher.fnal.gov which is a 2 CPU 3.2GHz P4
with 1GB memory.
| |
processed |
written |
POTs |
POTs per written evt |
seconds per gen evt |
total time |
| FarDet |
36538 |
36538 |
3.8e21 |
1.04001e17 |
1.2894 |
13.1hr |
FarDet (nue) |
9766 |
9766 |
1.0e21 |
1.02396e17 |
1.3258 |
3.6hr |
| NearDet |
42016 |
40713 |
4.0e16 |
9.82487e11 |
1.0910 |
12.7hr |
| NearRock |
257471 |
20877 |
4.0e16 |
1.91598e12 |
0.5765 |
42.2hr |
| NearOverlay |
1000 |
1000 |
4.0e16 |
--- |
--- |
~3hr |
The FarDet file represents 10yrs of data at our nominal POTs/yr.
The Near files represent 1000 spills (8min, 20sec)
at the nominal spill intensity;
for the NearDet files only those events that generated hits in an
active volume (i.e. scintillator strip) were written out.
One should note that the average 21 rock events/spill does not
necessarily translate into 21 muons through the detector. Nor
will a significant fraction of the interactions with vertices
in the detector be reconstructable due to their location in
the uninstrumented regions (partial planes and the spectrometer).
These serve just to add the correct smearing and confusion to
the reconstruction.
Processing the files
These .reroot.root files are ready to be processed via
loon with a job similar to that found in
$SRT_PUBLIC_CONTEXT/PhotonTransport/macros/simple.C.
These files are much too large to process in a single job both in
terms of CPU time and candidate output file size. This can be
easily dealt with by modifying the script to take two arguments:
a number of records to skip and a number of records to process.
void process_partial(int nskip=0, int nrun=1000000)
{
gSystem->Load("libDigitization");
gSystem->Load("libDetSim");
gSystem->Load("libPhotonTransport");
gSystem->Load("libDataUtil");
...
JobC jc;
...
jc.Path.Create("MyPath",
"RerootToTruthModule::Get "
"ScintHitToDigiPE::Get "
"DigiPEtoRawDigitModule::Get "
//"OtherModules::Reco "
//"Output::Put "
);
// Set up the input format as a reroot file.
jc.Input.Set("Format=reroot");
...
<more job configuration>
...
jc.Input.Next(nskip); // skip some records
jc.Path("MyPath").Run(nrun); // process a limited number more
jc.Path("MyPath").Report();
}
One the invokes the script with
$ loon -bq 'process_partial.C(10000,100)' file.reroot.root
Contact:
Robert Hatcher <rhatcher@fnal.gov>