Test-Beam 2002 Paper Outline and Preliminary Figure List

DRAFT (16-Jan-03)

Performance and Calibration of CMS Hadron-Barrel Calorimeter Wedges

____________________________________________
1) Introduction (Elias)

____________________________________________
2) Wedge Description (Freeman)

____________________________________________
3) Experimental Setup (Pawel)
beam line

engineering drawing of stand/wedges

7x7 drawing of crystals (2D)

eta vs phi drawing of wedges, 16x8 (2D)

HO (help from Indians)

____________________________________________
4) Electronics and Data Acquisition (Chris and Jim R.)
block diagram of electronics

Noise (pedestal) distributions

block diagram of DAQ

source driver

____________________________________________
5) Energy Response (R. Vidal and Shuichi)
Lego plots, 100 pi, 100 e, mu

HCAL pion response a) 20 GeV, b) 50 GeV, c) 100 GeV, d) 300 GeV

fraction of energy in a) one tower, b) 3x3, c) 5x5, d) 7x7 ???

HCAL electron response a) 20 GeV, b) 50 GeV, c) 100 GeV

fraction of energy in a) one tower, b) 3x3 ???

HCAL muon response 

____________________________________________
6) Eta Attenuation (R. Vidal and Shuichi)
HCAL beam response vs. eta

____________________________________________
7) Boundary Scans (R. Vidal and Shuichi)
   a) measuring Beam Position With Wire Chambers
x and y resolution

   b) Eta Boundary Within a Wedge
a) Energy in eta1 vs. x, b) Energy in eta2 vs. x, c) Energy in eta1+eta2 vs. x

   c) Phi Boundary Within a Wedge
a) Energy in phi1 vs. y, b) Energy in phi2 vs. y, c) Energy in phi1+phi2 vs. y

   d) Phi Boundary Between Two Wedges
a) Energy in phi1 vs. y, b) Energy in phi2 vs. y, c) Energy in phi1+phi2 vs. y

   e) Effect of Cerenkov Radiation in Fiber Bundles
Energy in ...

____________________________________________
8) Radioactive Source Calibration (Pawel)

   a) Description of the Calibration Technique
Source Scans for several etas

Source fits
   
   b) Eta Attenuation
Source response vs. eta

   c) Comparison With Beam
Source/electron vs. eta

Source/muon vs. eta

   d) CMS Calibration
GeV to ADC conversion

____________________________________________
9) Pulse Shape (Jim R. and John E.)

   a) Photo-tube Measurements
Pion, electron and muon pulses at different energies

   b) HTR Phase
Time sample distribution selected by phases

   c) Time Distribution
Extracted pulse shape

Energy collection ("Shuichi/Salavat Plot")

____________________________________________
10) Performance Together with Electromagnetic Crystals (R. Vidal, Pawel and Shuichi)

   a) Calibration of ECAL
ECAL electron energy response a) 20 GeV, b) 50 GeV, c) 100 GeV

   b) Layer-0 Weighting
Resolution for different weights

   c) Pion Response 
HCAL vs ECAL a) 20 GeV, b) 50 GeV, c) 100 GeV, d) 300 GeV with projections

   d) Effect of Material Between ECAL and HCAL
alpha plots vs material and energy

   e) e/pi

   f) Resolution vs energy

____________________________________________
11) Outer Calorimeter (Jim R.)

HO Time structure

HO energy distribution (muons) and comparison with noise

Improvement to Resolution

____________________________________________
12) Summary and Conclusion (Dan Green)


(about 110 figures on this list! compare to 70 in previous test-beam paper)